Egg yolk is full of cholesterol and fat; it is meant to maintain the development of a baby chick. When we eat it, it coats our blood cells; our blood gets thicker, changes our hormones, raises our cholesterol levels; there’s nothing healthy of eating the yolk of the egg. Eating one egg is like smoking five cigarettes?
Debunker Criticism: be careful of people finding studies to support what they already believe.
Conclusion:
Appears to be on the side of the debunker. One study found that a diet high in eggs, but lower in saturated fats, or food that is high in eggs but replaces saturated fats with healthier fats, actually had a positive or no effect on harmful cholesterol levels. Another study found that short-term egg consumption did not severely affect arterial function in healthy people.
In the International Journal of Cardiology, the same one that was referred to in the documentary, concluded that eating 1-2 eggs a day did not adversely affect blood cholesterol or LDL (bad cholesterol). This same study supported the debunker physician’s view that dietary cholesterol “may be less detrimental to cardiovascular health than previously thought”. So, I’m not sure why they chose a section of the ‘methods’ to say eating a sausage and egg sandwich was equivalent to McDonald’s McMuffin. It did say that but as a comparison.
Another study showed that “dietary cholesterol and Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) is small, as most subjects can effectively adapt to higher levels of cholesterol intake. Nevertheless, lowering dietary cholesterol content might reduce the risk of CHD considerably in a subgroup of individuals who are highly responsive to changes in cholesterol intake”.
A meta-analysis on eggs and risk of coronary heart disease showed a dose-response. Basically, more eggs (up to 1/day) was not found to be associated with coronary heart disease.
BUT is it compared to cigarettes?
A Canadian study did find that one egg was comparable to smoking five cigarettes, BUT what they didn’t add in the documentary was that the study itself said more research was needed to find any other dietary confounders, as well as the role of waist circumference. The study concluded that people at risk should lower their egg ingestion. This is similar to other studies that also show eggs are not bad for your arteries.
In summary,
I found evidence that they’re bad, evidence that they’re not bad. So I conclude that
anything in excess is bad! People at risk of certain problems should not eat certain things. This is the trend with every disease. An important topic to discuss, obviously, but dramatizing it as feeding your child five cigarettes is a bit extreme, in my opinion.
– 3 –
Documentary Point:
- The World Health Organization (WHO) says plutonium, cigarettes, processed meat as level 1 carcinogens.
Debunking criticism: plutonium is vegan
Conclusion:
YES. All of the above mentioned are labeled as group 1 carcinogens on the WHO website. By the way, its W-H-O, not the who (like the group.. each letter is pronounced individually, it’s not a word if that makes sense).
Anyway!
Is plutonium vegan as the debunking physician said?
I didn’t find any evidence that plutonium is found in plant foods. I’m not sure what drove him to say something like that. Whether or not he has supporting evidence to this, or he just wanted to make a shocking statement, no clue. I was shocked, and it made me look it up. If you are anything like me, you might do the same, and if you do find something that I missed, please share it with me!
– 4 –
Documentary Point: If people knew how bad these foods are maybe they wouldn’t eat them anymore
Debunker Criticism: NO! People were told cigarettes are harmful, and they still smoke, so people will keep up with bad habits even if told how bad they are.